United States v. Jeffrey Lane Fallis

48 F.3d 1225, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11593, 1995 WL 107066
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1995
Docket94-3203
StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1225 (United States v. Jeffrey Lane Fallis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jeffrey Lane Fallis, 48 F.3d 1225, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11593, 1995 WL 107066 (8th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1225
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Jeffrey Lane FALLIS, Appellant.

No. 94-3203.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Mar. 6, 1995.
Filed: Mar. 14, 1995.

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In March 1990, following his guilty plea to a federal offense, Jeffrey Lane Fallis was sentenced to 26 months in prison and three years of supervised release. In April 1993, while he was serving his supervised-release term, the district court1 found that he had violated release conditions and revoked his supervised release. The court ordered Fallis to serve 11 months in prison and thereafter to serve his remaining supervised-release term. In August 1994, while Fallis was back on supervised release, the district court again found that he had violated release conditions and revoked supervised release. This time, the court sentenced him to 11 months in prison with no further period of supervised release. Fallis appeals, arguing that the district court lacked authority to sentence him to 11 months in prison because the sentence extended beyond the expiration date of his supervised- release term.

This argument is foreclosed by this circuit's established case law. See United States v. Krabbenhoft, 998 F.2d 591, 593-94 (8th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Love, 19 F.3d 415, 416-17 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 434 (1994).

Accordingly, we affirm Fallis's sentence.

1

The HONORABLE JOHN B. JONES, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1225, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11593, 1995 WL 107066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffrey-lane-fallis-ca8-1995.