United States v. Jeffrey Harrison
This text of United States v. Jeffrey Harrison (United States v. Jeffrey Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-1149 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Jeffrey Allan Harrison, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: December 3, 1999 Filed: December 9, 1999 ___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Allan Harrison appeals the judgment entered by the District Court1 following his guilty plea to drug offenses. For reversal, he argues that the District Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. Because there is no indication in the record before us that Harrison entered into a conditional guilty plea, preserving the right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion, we conclude Harrison has waived his right to appeal the issue. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2); United States v.
1 The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. Jennings, 12 F.3d 836, 839 (8th Cir. 1994); United States v. Stewart, 972 F.2d 216, 217-18 (8th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jeffrey Harrison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffrey-harrison-ca8-1999.