United States v. Jeffrey Boyd

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jeffrey Boyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 999 F.3d 171
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 17, 2021·No. 19-2989·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 19-2989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY BOYD, Appellant (M.D.Pa. No. 4-18-cr-00281-001)

Before: AMBRO, PORTER, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The precedential opinion entered in this case on May 28, 2021 is hereby amended as follows:

- Page 13: a comma should be added after “Alito, J.” so that it reads “Alito, J., dissenting”. - Page 21: The “S” in “See” at the beginning of “See, e.g., Wood” should be italicized. - Page 30: The phrase “F.3d” should be added in between “836” and “341” so that it reads “836 F.3d at 341, 356”.

By the Court:

s/THOMAS L. AMBRO Circuit Judge Dated: August 17, 2021 CJG/cc: Michelle L. Olshefski, Esq. Frederick W. Ulrich, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jeffrey Boyd, (3d Cir. 2021).

United States v. Jeffrey Boyd (United States v. Jeffrey Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.