United States v. Jeffrey Banker
This text of 384 F. App'x 638 (United States v. Jeffrey Banker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jeffrey Ronald Banker appeals from the 125-month sentence imposed upon resen-tencing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
*639 Banker contends the district court erred by sentencing him as a career offender because his bank robbery conviction for the instant offense and other prior convictions were all part of a common course of conduct. The district court properly classified Banker as a career offender because Banker’s prior qualifying convictions are factually and temporally distinct from his bank robbery conviction. See U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l(a)(3); see also United States v. Gallegos-Gonzalez, 3 F.3d 325, 328 (9th Cir.1993) (appellant’s classification as a career offender under section 4B1.1 was proper).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
384 F. App'x 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffrey-banker-ca9-2010.