United States v. Jeffrey Anderson
This text of 484 F. App'x 848 (United States v. Jeffrey Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jeffrey Anderson appeals the district court’s order finding that he satisfies the criteria for commitment set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006) and ordering his continued commitment to the custody of the Attorney General. Specifically, the district court determined that Anderson continues to suffer from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another. We affirm.
We review the district court’s determination for clear error. United States v. Cox, 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir.1992). A factual finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court’s determination is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous.
Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 F. App'x 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffrey-anderson-ca4-2012.