United States v. Jeffery Kuster
This text of United States v. Jeffery Kuster (United States v. Jeffery Kuster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 23-1003 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jeffery Scott Kuster
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________
Submitted: April 21, 2023 Filed: April 26, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Jeffery Scott Kuster appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 12 months in prison and 24 months of supervised
1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief challenging the sentence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
This court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Kuster. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); see also United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court need not make specific findings on § 3553(a) factors; all that is generally required to satisfy appellate court is evidence that court was aware of relevant factors). The sentence was within the advisory Guidelines range and below the statutory limit. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (maximum revocation prison term is 5 years for Class A felony); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (maximum supervised release term is life); Perkins, 526 F.3d at 1110 (revocation sentence within Guidelines range is accorded presumption of reasonableness on appeal).
The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jeffery Kuster, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffery-kuster-ca8-2023.