United States v. Jeffery Jay Paeper

226 F. App'x 616
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 2007
Docket06-2617
StatusUnpublished

This text of 226 F. App'x 616 (United States v. Jeffery Jay Paeper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jeffery Jay Paeper, 226 F. App'x 616 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal of his 236-month sentence for participating in a methamphetamine-manufacturing conspiracy, Jeffery Jay Paeper challenges the district court’s 1 finding that he was subject to a 4-level aggravating-role enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a) for being a leader or organizer of criminal activity involving 5 or more participants or that was otherwise extensive. Upon review of the district court’s finding for clear error, see United States v. Mickle, 464 F.3d 804, 807 (8th Cir.2006), we affirm.

It is undisputed that more than 5 persons were involved in the conspiracy, and that Paeper directed others to obtain precursors for him and compensated some participants with small amounts of the manufactured drugs in return for their obtaining supplies for him. We cannot say that the district court’s finding was clearly erroneous. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 comment. (n. 4) (factors distinguishing leadership and organizational role from one of mere management or supervision); United States v. Bohena, 223 F.3d 797, 804 (8th Cir.2000) (terms “organizer” and “leader” are given broad definition in assessing applicability of enhancement); cf. United States v. Lashley, 251 F.3d 706, 712-13 (8th Cir.2001) (evidence sufficient to support leadership enhancement where defendant directed where drugs were cooked, paid property owners in drugs, and directed others to steal precursors); United States v. Coleman, 148 F.3d 897, 902-03 (8th Cir.1998) (evidence sufficient to support leadership enhancement based on defendant’s decision-making authority over procurement of equipment, supplies, and chemical ingredients in methamphetamine-manufacturing conspiracy).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 F. App'x 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffery-jay-paeper-ca8-2007.