United States v. Jefferson
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, STEWART, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Justin T. JEFFERSON
Logistics Specialist Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202000005
Decided: 25 February 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Michael J. Luken (arraignment)
Hayes C. Larsen (trial)
Sentence adjudged 3 September 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for six months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
LCDR Erin L. Alexander, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Jefferson, NMCCA No. 202000005 Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jefferson (United States v. Jefferson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.