United States v. Jefferson

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals·Decided February 25, 2021·No. 202000005·Published

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before

GASTON, STEWART, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Justin T. JEFFERSON

Logistics Specialist Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 202000005

Decided: 25 February 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge:

Michael J. Luken (arraignment)

Hayes C. Larsen (trial)

Sentence adjudged 3 September 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for six months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant:

LCDR Erin L. Alexander, JAGC, USN

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

United States v. Jefferson, NMCCA No. 202000005 Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jefferson, (N.M. 2021).

United States v. Jefferson (United States v. Jefferson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related