United States v. Jefferson Morgan, Jr.
This text of 532 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Jefferson Morgan, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
This Court accepts the government’s concession that, in the interests of justice, Morgan’s sentence should be vacated, see United States v. Jones, 696 F.3d 932, 937-38 (9th Cir.2012) (discussing resolving a possible conflict between a sentence orally pronounced and the sentence contained in a subsequent written judgment), and that this case should be remanded for resentencing on an open record, see United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc). At oral argument Morgan did not object to this suggested resolution of his appeal.
Vacated and Remanded.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jefferson-morgan-jr-ca9-2013.