United States v. Jefferson Morgan, Jr.

532 F. App'x 666
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2013·No. 12-10303·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This Court accepts the government’s concession that, in the interests of justice, Morgan’s sentence should be vacated, see United States v. Jones, 696 F.3d 932, 937-38 (9th Cir.2012) (discussing resolving a possible conflict between a sentence orally pronounced and the sentence contained in a subsequent written judgment), and that this case should be remanded for resentencing on an open record, see United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc). At oral argument Morgan did not object to this suggested resolution of his appeal.

Vacated and Remanded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

**

The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jefferson Morgan, Jr., 532 F. App'x 666 (9th Cir. 2013).

532 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Jefferson Morgan, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Earl Matthews
278 F.3d 880 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Duane Jones
696 F.3d 932 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)