United States v. Jefferson

198 F. App'x 3
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 2006
DocketNo. 03-3062
StatusPublished

This text of 198 F. App'x 3 (United States v. Jefferson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jefferson, 198 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs by the parties and oral arguments of counsel. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Darrell Lee Jefferson appeals the District Court’s ruling on remand denying his claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Finding no error in the District Court’s decision, we affirm the judgment from which this appeal was taken, for the reasons stated by the District Court.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 F. App'x 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jefferson-cadc-2006.