United States v. Jefferson

382 F. App'x 590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jefferson. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 F.3d 928
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2010·No. 07-50024·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER

We hereby recall the mandate issued on April 4, 2010. The memorandum disposition filed on March 31, 2010, is withdrawn, and a replacement memorandum disposition is filed contemporaneously with this order. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

MEMORANDUM **

Alonso Jefferson appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 240-month sentence for conspiracy to manufacture, to aid and abet the manufacture of, and to possess with intent to distribute phencycli-dine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jefferson’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief, but no answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jefferson, 382 F. App'x 590 (9th Cir. 2010).

382 F. App'x 590 (United States v. Jefferson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)