United States v. Jean Roussel Eloi

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 13, 2016·No. 15-13868·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 15-13868 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 15-13868 Non-Argument Calendar _________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00248-JA-GJK-l

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEAN ROUSSEL ELOI,

Defendant-Appellant. _________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________

(October 13, 2016)

Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Godfrey, appointed appellate counsel for Jean Eloi, has filed a motion

to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our Case: 15-13868 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 2 of 2

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Eloi's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. All pending

motions are DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jean Roussel Eloi, (11th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Jean Roussel Eloi (United States v. Jean Roussel Eloi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)