United States v. J.B. Stringfellow, Jr., Concerned Neighbors in Action and Penny Newman, Intervenors-Appellants
This text of 755 F.2d 1383 (United States v. J.B. Stringfellow, Jr., Concerned Neighbors in Action and Penny Newman, Intervenors-Appellants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The portion of the order of February 17, 1984 denying appellants’ motion to intervene as of right is reversed. The portion of the order granting appellants leave to intervene permissively is vacated. Upon remand appellants shall be granted leave to intervene as of right.
In view of the decision set forth above, we need not decide the question as to the appropriateness of the conditions that the district court attached to the appellants’ participation as a Permissive intervenor. We, of course, express no view as to what conditions, if any, may appropriately be placed upon the appellants’ participation in the litigation in their capacity as inter-venors as of right, or upon the participation of any other parties to the litigation. An opinion will follow.
REVERSED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
755 F.2d 1383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jb-stringfellow-jr-concerned-neighbors-in-action-and-ca9-1985.