United States v. Jay Monson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2019·No. 18-3028·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 18-3028

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jay Monson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge

Submitted: August 7, 2019 Filed: August 19, 2019

[Unpublished]

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jay Monson appeals the district court’s1 amended judgment reducing his sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b).

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because it does not meet the criteria of 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). See United States v. Haskins, 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (jurisdiction over an appeal of a Rule 35(b) sentence is governed by § 3742(a); dismissing for lack of jurisdiction because appeal did not satisfy § 3742(a) criteria).

Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jay Monson, (8th Cir. 2019).

United States v. Jay Monson (United States v. Jay Monson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Austin A. Haskins
479 F.3d 955 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)