United States v. Jay Monson
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 18-3028
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jay Monson
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge
Submitted: August 7, 2019 Filed: August 19, 2019
[Unpublished]
Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Jay Monson appeals the district court’s1 amended judgment reducing his sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b).
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because it does not meet the criteria of 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). See United States v. Haskins, 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (jurisdiction over an appeal of a Rule 35(b) sentence is governed by § 3742(a); dismissing for lack of jurisdiction because appeal did not satisfy § 3742(a) criteria).
Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jay Monson (United States v. Jay Monson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.