United States v. Jay Goldstein

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jay Goldstein. Read the opinion of the Court — 914 F.3d 200
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 30, 2018·No. 15-4094·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 15-4094

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JAY GOLDSTEIN a/k/a Yaakov

JAY GOLDSTEIN,

Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.N.J. No. 3-14-cr-00287-003)

District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before: CHAGARES, RESTREPO, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion entered July 7, 2017 and amended on July 17, 2017 is hereby VACATED as to appeal 15-4094 only.

The Court directs that counsel provide it with supplemental letter memoranda on the subject of cell site location information and the applicability to this case of the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. ___, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018). The letter memoranda shall not exceed 10 pages in length and shall be filed by September 25, 2018.

By the Court,

s/ JANE R. ROTH Circuit Judge

Dated: August 30, 2018 CJG/cc: Mark E. Coyne, Esq.

Norman Gross, Esq. Glenn J. Moramarco, Esq. Aidan P. O'Connor, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jay Goldstein, (3d Cir. 2018).

United States v. Jay Goldstein (United States v. Jay Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carpenter v. United States
585 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2018)