United States v. Jay Briley

698 F. App'x 105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jay Briley. Read the opinion of the Court — 770 F.3d 267
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2017·No. 17-6684·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Bonanza Briley appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for a reduction in sentence, for summary judgment, and for production of sealed records for use in his civil case, and granting the Government’s motion to seal an exhibit Briley filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Briley, No. 1:12-cr-00482-LO-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 16, 2017; entered May 17, 2017). We deny Briley’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jay Briley, 698 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2017).

698 F. App'x 105 (United States v. Jay Briley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.