United States v. Javaris Montez Bloodser

610 F. App'x 952
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 27, 2015·No. 14-12175·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER .CURIAM:

Donald L. Johstono, appointed counsel for Javaris Montez Bloodser in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that coun *953 sel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bloodser’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Javaris Montez Bloodser, 610 F. App'x 952 (11th Cir. 2015).

610 F. App'x 952 (United States v. Javaris Montez Bloodser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bloodser v. Owens
W.D. Tennessee, 2021