United States v. Jason Woodring

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-2734 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jason Woodring

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________

Submitted: April 17, 2023 Filed: April 20, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Federal prisoner Jason Woodring appeals the district court’s 1 order granting the government’s motion for $1,000.87 from Woodring’s inmate trust account to be

1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. applied to his restitution obligations. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Contrary to Woodring’s contention on appeal, the district court properly considered evidence showing that he had received multiple stimulus payments, including a $1,200 economic impact payment in December 2020. This court declines to consider arguments that Woodring raises for the first time on appeal. See Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. v. Wall St. Equity Grp., Inc., 809 F.3d 1018, 1022 (8th Cir. 2016) (appellate court ordinarily does not consider argument raised for first time on appeal).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-