United States v. Jason Roberts

Opinion

Case: 16-10404 Document: 00513722100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10404 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 18, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JASON PAUL ROBERTS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-267-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jason Paul Roberts raises issues that are foreclosed by United States v. Schofield, 802 F.3d 722 (5th Cir. 2015). In Schofield, 802 F.3d at 729-31, we held that a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1470 qualified as a sex offense for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (SORNA) and that SORNA’s residual clause is not ambiguous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-10404 Document: 00513722100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

No. 16-10404

or unconstitutionally vague. Accordingly, Roberts’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.