United States v. Jason L. Shadwell
This text of 69 F. App'x 344 (United States v. Jason L. Shadwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jason L. Shadwell pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and the district court 1 sentenced him to fifty-seven months in prison and three years of supervised release. As relevant, the district court raised his base offense level under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A), concluding that Shad- *345 well’s prior state felony conviction for burglarizing a barn was a crime of violence. Shadwell objected below to having his pri- or conviction treated as a crime of violence, was overruled by the district court at sentencing, and renews his challenge on appeal.
As Shadwell recognizes in his brief, his argument is foreclosed by this circuit’s precedent holding that commercial burglary is a crime of violence. See United States v. Blahowski, 324 F.3d 592, 594-98 (8th Cir.2003) (reaffirming holding of United States v. Hascall, 76 F.3d 902, 904-06 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 948, 117 S.Ct. 358, 136 L.Ed.2d 250 (1996)). Only the en banc court or the Supreme Court can overrule this precedent, and Shad-well’s petition for initial hearing en banc was denied on March 6, 2003.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 F. App'x 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jason-l-shadwell-ca8-2003.