United States v. Jarvis
This text of 163 F. App'x 583 (United States v. Jarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Mark Anthony Jarvis appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to making a false statement on a bankruptcy petition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jarvis contends that the case should be remanded for a correction of the written judgment to conform with the district court’s oral pronouncement of his sentence. We disagree. Because the oral pronouncement was ambiguous, the unambiguous written judgment controls. See Fenner v. United States Parole Commission, 251 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jarvis-ca9-2006.