United States v. Jarvill
This text of 63 F. App'x 975 (United States v. Jarvill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Frank Jarvill appeals the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371, mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742.
We reject Jarvill’s contention that his sentence should be vacated because of inadequate notice for the reason that it does not constitute reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jarvill-ca9-2003.