United States v. Jaramillo
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41402 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL CARRIZALES JARAMILLO,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-261-1 -------------------- July 20, 2000
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Manuel Carrizales Jaramillo appeals his jury-trial
conviction for illegal reentry after deportation and
impersonating a United States citizen. He avers that the
district court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the
defense of duress.
We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and
hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
failing to instruct the jury on the defense of duress. United
States v. Tannehill, 49 F.3d 1049, 1057 (5th Cir. 1995).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-41402 -2-
Jaramillo failed to show that he had no reasonable legal
alternative to violating the law. United States v. Harvey, 897
F.2d 1300, 1304-05 (5th Cir. 1990), overruled on other grounds,
United States v. Lambert, 984 F.2d 658, 661-62 (5th Cir. 1993)(en
banc).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jaramillo (United States v. Jaramillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.