United States v. Jaramillo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2000·No. 99-41402·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41402 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL CARRIZALES JARAMILLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-261-1 -------------------- July 20, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel Carrizales Jaramillo appeals his jury-trial

conviction for illegal reentry after deportation and

impersonating a United States citizen. He avers that the

district court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the

defense of duress.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and

hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

failing to instruct the jury on the defense of duress. United

States v. Tannehill, 49 F.3d 1049, 1057 (5th Cir. 1995).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-41402 -2-

Jaramillo failed to show that he had no reasonable legal

alternative to violating the law. United States v. Harvey, 897

F.2d 1300, 1304-05 (5th Cir. 1990), overruled on other grounds,

United States v. Lambert, 984 F.2d 658, 661-62 (5th Cir. 1993)(en

banc).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jaramillo, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Jaramillo (United States v. Jaramillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Donny Joel Harvey
897 F.2d 1300 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. David Lambert
984 F.2d 658 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Paul Douglas Tannehill
49 F.3d 1049 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)