United States v. Janhoi Cole

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Janhoi Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 F.4th 421
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 9, 2021·No. 20-2105·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 9, 2021

By the Court:

No. 20-2105

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Central District of Illinois.

v. No. 3:18-cr-30038-RM-TSH-1

JANHOI COLE, Richard Mills, Defendant-Appellant. Judge.

ORDER

The court has voted sua sponte to rehear this appeal en banc. Accordingly, the panel opinion of April 16, 2021 is vacated, and the court will set an argument date by separate order. The parties shall each file a supplemental brief of up to 8,000 words no later than July 15, 2021 on the questions whether and when travel-plan questions fall within the “mission” of a traffic stop under Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015). The parties’ briefs should also address how the court’s recent decision in United States v. Lewis, 920 F.3d 483 (7th Cir. 2019), affects those questions, and whether and when an officer may ask travel-plan questions if such questions are not part of the “mission” of a stop.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Janhoi Cole, (7th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Janhoi Cole (United States v. Janhoi Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. United States
575 U.S. 348 (Supreme Court, 2015)
United States v. Lewis
920 F.3d 483 (Seventh Circuit, 2019)