United States v. Jamie Hargrove

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2024·No. 23-6597·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6597 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6597

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMIE M. HARGROVE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00249-BO-1)

Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamie M. Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6597 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jamie M. Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hargrove, No.

5:11-cr-00249-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. May 22, 2023); Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th

Cir. 1993) (holding that claims raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be

considered, absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of

justice). We deny Hargrove’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jamie Hargrove, (4th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Jamie Hargrove (United States v. Jamie Hargrove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United States
1 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)