United States v. James Williams

Fourth Circuit

United States v. James Williams

359 F.2d 433, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6560

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 1966·No. 10332·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, defendant below, was convicted by a jury on a charge of theft from an interstate shipment in violation of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 659. At the time of the theft the shipment was being transported from New Jersey to Arkansas by the defendant in his employer's truck. The only point of error urged on this appeal is the admission in evidence, over objection, of certain waybills or shipping orders pertaining to the interstate shipment prepared by the shippers and signed by the defendant.

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we perceive no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, defendant below, was convicted by a jury on a charge of theft from an interstate shipment in violation of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 659. At the time of the theft the shipment was being transported from New Jersey to Arkansas by the defendant in his employer's truck. The only point of error urged on this appeal is the admission in evidence, over objection, of certain waybills or shipping orders pertaining to the interstate shipment prepared by the shippers and signed by the defendant.

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we perceive no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

United States v. James Williams, 359 F.2d 433, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6560 (4th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

359 F.2d 433 (United States v. James Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.