United States v. James William Wollweber

Fifth Circuit

United States v. James William Wollweber

445 F.2d 295

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 5, 1971

Docket30792_1

StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 295 (United States v. James William Wollweber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. James William Wollweber, 445 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21 . 1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

The defendant contended that the introduction of evidence establishing specific intent to commit fraud by proving prior unrelated third party transactions (see United States v. Pittman, 5 Cir., 1971, 439 F.2d 906 for which the defendant had not been indicted or tried violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by the practical compulsion that he waive the privilege to contradict the evidence through his testimony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI