United States v. James Wilde

585 F. App'x 336
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 2014
Docket13-30360
StatusUnpublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 336 (United States v. James Wilde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Wilde, 585 F. App'x 336 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant James Albert Wilde was convicted of violating 36 C.F.R. §§ 2.32(a)(1), (2) and 3.2(b). See also 16 U.S.C. § 3; Alaska Stat. § 05.25.055(a), (d); Alaska Stat. § 05.25.090(b)(2). Wilde appeals his conviction, arguing that the National Park Service does not have authority to enforce these regulations on the part of the Yukon River that runs within the geographic boundaries of the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

According to 16 U.S.C. § 3103, “[o]nly those lands within the boundaries of any conservation system unit which are public lands ... shall be deemed to be included as a portion of such unit.” Id. (emphasis added). The statute necessarily divides “lands within the boundaries of any conservation system unit” into “public lands” and wow-public lands. See id. While only “public lands” are “included as a portion of such unit,” any wow-public lands nevertheless are “lands within the boundaries of [the] conservation system unit.” See id.; see also 16 U.S.C. § 3102.

Wilde is correct that certain “regulations [are] applicable solely to public lands within such units.” 16 U.S.C. § 3103; see, e.g., 50 C.F.R. §§ 100.10, 100.26(n)(l)(v). But Wilde was not convicted pursuant to any such regulation. Instead, Wilde was convicted pursuant to generally applicable “regulations concerning boating and other activities on or relating to waters located within areas of the National Park System, including waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.” 16 U.S.C. § la-201); see also 16 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2; 36 C.F.R. § 1.2(a)(3).

There can be no dispute that the relevant part of the Yukon River is located within the geographic boundaries of the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, a “unit[ ] of the National Park System [to] be administered by the Secretary under the laws governing the administration of such lands....” 16 U.S.C. § 410hh(10); see also 16 U.S.C. § 3201. Consequently, Wilde was “under the jurisdiction of the *337 National Park Service,” regardless of whether he was on “public lands” or non public lands. See 16 U.S.C. § 3; Sturgeon v. Masica, No. 13-36165+, Slip op. at 22-23.

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 F. App'x 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-wilde-ca9-2014.