United States v. James Vigil

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: May 2, 2025
• Docket: 24-2560
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-2560 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

James Vigil, also known as Joker

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs ____________

Submitted: April 29, 2025 Filed: May 2, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

James Vigil appeals after a jury found him guilty of unlawful possession of a firearm as a prohibited person, and the district court1 sentenced him to 120 months

1 The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. in prison. His counsel has requested leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdict, and arguing that the court erred in calculating the Guidelines range. Vigil has filed a pro se brief raising similar challenges.

Upon careful review, we conclude there was sufficient evidence to support Vigil’s conviction. See United States v. Cornelison, 717 F.3d 623, 626 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); United States v. Smart, 501 F.3d 862, 865 (8th Cir. 2007); United States v. Oleson, 310 F.3d 1085, 1090 (8th Cir. 2002). We also conclude the district court did not commit reversible error with respect to calculating the applicable Guidelines range. See United States v. Peterson, 455 F.3d 834, 837 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Finally, we conclude that Vigil’s additional arguments raised in his pro se brief do not warrant vacating his conviction or sentence.

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________

-2-