United States v. James Triplett

928 F.2d 1134, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9967, 1991 WL 39630
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 1991
Docket91-3053
StatusUnpublished

This text of 928 F.2d 1134 (United States v. James Triplett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Triplett, 928 F.2d 1134, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9967, 1991 WL 39630 (6th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

928 F.2d 1134

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James TRIPLETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-3053.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 21, 1991.

S.D.Ohio, No. 90-00186; Halschuh (C.J.)

S.D.Ohio

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal as having been taken from a nonappealable order. Appellant responded and filed a motion to stay the district court's order of December 19, 1990.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that on December 19, 1990, the district court filed an order directing that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4241(b) a psychiatric or psychological evaluation of appellant be conducted for use in determining appellant's competency to stand trial. Appellant appealed the order on January 8, 1991.

This court lacks jurisdiction in this appeal. Although an order determining competency or incompetency to stand trial may be appealable, an order which merely directs that an evaluation take place is not appealable. United States v. Cheama, 730 F.2d 1383, 1386 (10th Cir.1984).

It is ORDERED that the motion for stay be denied, the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Rule 8(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lennie Cheama
730 F.2d 1383 (Tenth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
928 F.2d 1134, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9967, 1991 WL 39630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-triplett-ca6-1991.