United States v. James Terrell Knight

413 F.2d 445
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 1969
Docket27001_1
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 413 F.2d 445 (United States v. James Terrell Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Terrell Knight, 413 F.2d 445 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a revocation of probation. From the facts disclosed by the record we find the appeal to be without merit. 1 The revocation proceedings were brought following the conviction of appellant and another for a misdemeanor in connection with non-tax-paid distilled spirits. 2 Revocation of probation is a matter of judicial discretion. Seymore v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1967, 383 F.2d 384. The only issue, therefore, is whether or not the trial court abused this discretion. Broadus v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 317 F.2d 212, 213. We find no such abuse.

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804.

2

. See the opinion rendered this day in the matter of Elmer S. Chapman and James T. Knight v. United States of America, 5 Cir., 1969, 413 F.2d 440 affirming the conviction of appellant and his codefend-ant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
413 F.2d 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-terrell-knight-ca5-1969.