United States v. James Robinson

488 F. App'x 176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 2012
Docket12-1618
StatusUnpublished

This text of 488 F. App'x 176 (United States v. James Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Robinson, 488 F. App'x 176 (8th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Robinson appeals his 33-month, within-Guidelines sentence for misprison of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4, relating to his involvement in a methamphetamine conspiracy. Robinson argues the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court 1 gave too much consideration to his extensive criminal history and not enough consideration to other mitigating factors. We have carefully reviewed the sentencing transcript and find these arguments to be without merit. The district court did not abuse its considerable discretion in sentencing Robinson to 33 months in prison. See United States v. Woodard, 675 F.3d 1147, 1151 (8th Cir.2012) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Woodard
675 F.3d 1147 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 F. App'x 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-robinson-ca8-2012.