United States v. James Ray Ammons

Sixth Circuit

United States v. James Ray Ammons

625 F.2d 130, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15934

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJuly 8, 1980

Docket78-3481

StatusPublished

This text of 625 F.2d 130 (United States v. James Ray Ammons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. James Ray Ammons, 625 F.2d 130, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15934 (6th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a very complicated fact dispute over whether or not a $5,000 cash appeal bond when released to defendant Ammons should be paid over to his attorney who had filed an assignment from Ammons to him to pay part of his attorney’s fees, or should be released to the United States which subsequent to the assignment being filed had filed a claim for $5,000 to be applied to a fine which was part of defendant Ammons’ sentence.

On consideration of this entire record, the judgment of the District Court which recognizes the validity of defendant Ammons’ assignment to his attorney is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of Judge Charles M. Allen entered September 22, 1977.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a very complicated fact dispute over whether or not a $5,000 cash appeal bond when released to defendant Ammons should be paid over to his attorney who had filed an assignment from Ammons to him to pay part of his attorney’s fees, or should be released to the United States which subsequent to the assignment being filed had filed a claim for $5,000 to be applied to a fine which was part of defendant Ammons’ sentence.

On consideration of this entire record, the judgment of the District Court which recognizes the validity of defendant Ammons’ assignment to his attorney is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of Judge Charles M. Allen entered September 22, 1977.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

625 F.2d 130, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-ray-ammons-ca6-1980.