United States v. JAMES
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
DALY, KISOR, and GERRITY Appellate Military Judges
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Maurice A. JAMES Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202500443
Decided: 17 July 2026
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Frankie D. Hutchison
Sentence adjudged 6 October 2025 by a special court-martial tried at Naval Base Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 12 months and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander Candice C. Albright, JAGC, USN
United States v. James, NMCCA No. 202500443 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. JAMES (United States v. JAMES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.