United States v. James Niblock

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 18, 2015
• Docket: 14-7460
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES R. NIBLOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:02-cr-00568-GBL-1)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James R. Niblock, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Acting United States Attorney, William P. Jauquet, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James R. Niblock appeals the district court’s order

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis in which he

alleged that his conviction for wire fraud is no longer valid in

light of United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332 (4th Cir.

2012), which addressed proper venue for wire fraud prosecutions.

We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in

the district court’s denial of the writ. See United States v.

Akinsade, 686 F.3d 248, 251-52 (4th Cir. 2012) (providing review

standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED