United States v. James McFarlin
This text of 306 F. App'x 342 (United States v. James McFarlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James Blake McFarlin appeals the 188-month prison sentence that the district court 1 imposed following his guilty plea to possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). For reversal, McFarlin argues that the district court improperly sentenced him as a career offender, because his prior Arkansas conviction for burglarizing a pharmacy, barber shop, and beauty shop should not have been classified as a “crime of violence” for purposes of triggering career-offender status. See U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1 (defining career offender); 4B1.2(a) (defining “crime of violence”). As McFarlin acknowledges, we have repeatedly held that commercial burglary is a “crime of violence” within the meaning of section 4B1.2. See United States v. Bell, 445 F.3d 1086, 1087-88 (8th Cir.2006); United States v. Blahowski, 324 F.3d 592, 595 (8th Cir.2003).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 F. App'x 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-mcfarlin-ca8-2009.