United States v. James Lee Evans

908 F.2d 974, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23859, 1990 WL 106804
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. James Lee Evans. Read the opinion of the Court — 951 F.2d 729
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 30, 1990·No. 90-5814·Unpublished

Opinion

908 F.2d 974

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Lee EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-5814.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 30, 1990.

Before KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that appellant appealed on June 14, 1990, from the order entered June 1, 1990, denying appointment of counsel. Such an order is not appealable. Holt v. Ford, 862 F.2d 850, 851 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc); Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dep't, 763 F.2d 757, 764 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 (1985).

It is ORDERED that the motions for counsel and pauper status on appeal be denied and the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. James Lee Evans, 908 F.2d 974, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23859, 1990 WL 106804 (6th Cir. 1990).

908 F.2d 974 (United States v. James Lee Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert Holt v. J. Paul Ford, Warden
862 F.2d 850 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)