United States v. James L. Nall
This text of 837 F.2d 1091 (United States v. James L. Nall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James L. NALL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 87-5698.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 22, 1988.
Before MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 F.2d 1091, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 607, 1988 WL 4417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-l-nall-ca6-1988.