United States v. James L. Conley

865 F.2d 1260, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17427, 1988 WL 138734
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. James L. Conley. Read the opinion of the Court — 779 F.2d 970
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1988·No. 88-7605·Unpublished

Opinion

865 F.2d 1260
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James L. CONLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-7605.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 29, 1988.
Decided: Dec. 14, 1988.

James L. Conley, appellant pro se.

Joseph John Aronica (Office of the U.S. Attorney), for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James L. Conley appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Conley, CR No. 82-173-A (E.D.Va. Mar. 29, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. James L. Conley, 865 F.2d 1260, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17427, 1988 WL 138734 (4th Cir. 1988).

865 F.2d 1260 (United States v. James L. Conley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Allsbrook
865 F.2d 1260 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)