United States v. James Junior Finch

558 F.2d 555
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. James Junior Finch. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 F.2d 822
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 29, 1977·No. 75-2149·Published

Opinion

558 F.2d 555

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James Junior FINCH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 75-2149.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 19, 1977.
Revised July 29, 1977.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, James F. Battin, Judge.

Keith L. Burrowes, Asst. U. S. Atty., Billings, Mont., argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert W. Holmstrom, argued, Longan & Holmstrom, Billings, Mont., for defendant-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and WONG,* District Judge.

Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Finch v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2909, 53 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1977) (per curiam), the appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Honorable Dick Yin Wong, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. James Junior Finch, 558 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1977).

558 F.2d 555 (United States v. James Junior Finch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finch v. United States
433 U.S. 676 (Supreme Court, 1977)
United States v. Finch
558 F.2d 555 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)