United States v. James Howard Wentz

309 F.2d 849, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 1962
Docket13907_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 F.2d 849 (United States v. James Howard Wentz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Howard Wentz, 309 F.2d 849, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3576 (3d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction on the second and fourth counts of an indictment which charged the appellant with violations of Section 472 of Title 18 U.S.C., to wit, the passing of counterfeited obligations of the United States with intent to defraud. The ap" *850 pellant here argues, as he did in the court below in support of a motion for acquittal, that the evidence was insufficient to support the allegation that the obligations were counterfeit. We have reviewed the record and find that the argument is clearly without merit; the spuriousness of the obligations was amply established by competent evidence.

The judgment of the court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert Warren Self
309 F.2d 850 (Third Circuit, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 F.2d 849, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-howard-wentz-ca3-1962.