United States v. James Henry Tucker

Fourth Circuit

United States v. James Henry Tucker

337 F.2d 287

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 1, 1964

Docket9458

StatusPublished

This text of 337 F.2d 287 (United States v. James Henry Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. James Henry Tucker, 337 F.2d 287 (4th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct appeal from his conviction for theft from the mails, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding that the theft was from the mail. The strong circumstantial evidence that it was, coupled with the defendant’s own admission, to which an accomplice testified, furnished ample support for the verdict, however, and requires affirmance of the conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this direct appeal from his conviction for theft from the mails, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding that the theft was from the mail. The strong circumstantial evidence that it was, coupled with the defendant’s own admission, to which an accomplice testified, furnished ample support for the verdict, however, and requires affirmance of the conviction.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

337 F.2d 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-henry-tucker-ca4-1964.