United States v. James Haywood Beaman

323 F.2d 365
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1963
Docket28029_1
StatusPublished

This text of 323 F.2d 365 (United States v. James Haywood Beaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Haywood Beaman, 323 F.2d 365 (2d Cir. 1963).

Opinion

323 F.2d 365

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
James Haywood BEAMAN, Appellant.

No. 93.

Docket 28029.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued October 16, 1963.

Decided October 16, 1963.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Weinfeld, Judge.

Julian C. Tepper, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York (Charles J. Fanning, John S. Martin, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The learned judge below found, after a trial before him without jury, that the Government had established beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of having violated 18 U.S.C. § 2312.

In open court we affirm the judgment below.

We thank Julian C. Tepper who, having been assigned to represent the appellant, adequately performed his professional duty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 F.2d 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-haywood-beaman-ca2-1963.