United States v. James H. McConnell and James H. Dondich
This text of 537 F.2d 148 (United States v. James H. McConnell and James H. Dondich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James H. McCONNELL and James H. Dondich, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-3248.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 16, 1976.
John L. Briggs, U. S. Atty., D. Frank Winkles, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Claude H. Tison, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert A. Harper, Jr., Gainesville, Fla., for McConnell.
Morton Berger, White Plains, N. Y., for Dondich.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge, and MILLER,* Associate Judge.
PER CURIAM:
In light of our opinion today in United States v. Morrow, --- F.2d ---- (5 Cir. 1976), the Government's appeal in the instant case is moot.
Of the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 F.2d 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-h-mcconnell-and-james-h-dond-ca5-1976.