United States v. James Fred Pennell
This text of 358 F.2d 748 (United States v. James Fred Pennell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
358 F.2d 748
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
James Fred PENNELL, Appellant.
No. 10348.
No. 10349.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 6, 1966.
Decided April 13, 1966.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury; Edwin M. Stanley, Judge.
W. H. Elwee, No. Wilkesboro, N. C. (John E. Hall, No. Wilkesboro, N. C., on brief), for appellant.
William H. Murdock, U. S. Atty. (H. Marshall Simpson, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After full consideration of the briefs and the oral arguments, we find no reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
358 F.2d 748, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-fred-pennell-ca4-1966.