United States v. James Francis Hill

Sixth Circuit

United States v. James Francis Hill

291 F.2d 627, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4151

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1961

Docket14372

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 F.2d 627 (United States v. James Francis Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. James Francis Hill, 291 F.2d 627, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4151 (6th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER.

This cause came on to be heard on the record and on the briefs of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

It is ordered that the order of District Judge Robert L. Taylor denying the motion of appellant, James Francis Hill, under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., to correct the record in Cases Nos. 10,113 and 10,114 (Criminal Docket, Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division) be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

This cause came on to be heard on the record and on the briefs of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

It is ordered that the order of District Judge Robert L. Taylor denying the motion of appellant, James Francis Hill, under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., to correct the record in Cases Nos. 10,113 and 10,114 (Criminal Docket, Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division) be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 F.2d 627, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-francis-hill-ca6-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack