United States v. James Ferguson and A-Bonding Company, Bankers Fire & Casualty Insurance Company

529 F.2d 999
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1976
Docket75--3265
StatusPublished

This text of 529 F.2d 999 (United States v. James Ferguson and A-Bonding Company, Bankers Fire & Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Ferguson and A-Bonding Company, Bankers Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, 529 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

529 F.2d 999

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James FERGUSON and A-Bonding Company, Defendants,
Bankers Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75--3265 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 2, 1976.
Rehearing Denied May 21, 1976.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Alexander A. Lawrence, Chief Judge.

James T. Wilson, Jr., William A. Trotter, III, Augusta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

R. Jackson B. Smith, Jr., U.S. Atty., Elizabeth C. Chalker, Asst. U.S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, GEWIN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment below is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the district court. United States v. Ferguson, et al., 409 F.Supp. 393 (S.D.Ga.1975).

Affirmed.

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 F.2d 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-ferguson-and-a-bonding-company-bankers-fire-ca5-1976.