United States v. James Erwin, Jr.

Sixth Circuit

United States v. James Erwin, Jr.

78 F.3d 232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3986, 1996 WL 111573

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1996

Docket94-1766

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 78 F.3d 232 (United States v. James Erwin, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. James Erwin, Jr., 78 F.3d 232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3986, 1996 WL 111573 (6th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

*233 ORDER

Prior report: 71 F.3d 218.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en bane shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI