United States v. James Ellis
This text of 37 F. App'x 833 (United States v. James Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James Ellis pleaded guilty to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2. The district court, 1 after denying Ellis a 2-level acceptanee-of-responsibility reduction, sentenced him to 38 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Ellis argues that the district court erred in denying him the acceptance-of-responsibility reduction.
The district court did not clearly err in denying the reduction. See United States v. Perez, 270 F.3d 737, 739 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1336, 152 L.Ed.2d 241 (2002). The evidence at sentencing showed that after his arrest Ellis absconded from a halfway house, attempted to break into his former girlfriend’s residence, made threatening phone calls to her from jail, and received an obstruction-of-justice en *834 hancement. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.4); United States v. Martinez, 234 F.3d 1047, 1048 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam); United States v. Ngo, 132 F.3d 1231, 1233 (8th Cir.1997).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 F. App'x 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-ellis-ca8-2002.