United States v. James Ellis

37 F. App'x 833
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 7, 2002
Docket01-3957
StatusUnpublished

This text of 37 F. App'x 833 (United States v. James Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Ellis, 37 F. App'x 833 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Ellis pleaded guilty to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2. The district court, 1 after denying Ellis a 2-level acceptanee-of-responsibility reduction, sentenced him to 38 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Ellis argues that the district court erred in denying him the acceptance-of-responsibility reduction.

The district court did not clearly err in denying the reduction. See United States v. Perez, 270 F.3d 737, 739 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1336, 152 L.Ed.2d 241 (2002). The evidence at sentencing showed that after his arrest Ellis absconded from a halfway house, attempted to break into his former girlfriend’s residence, made threatening phone calls to her from jail, and received an obstruction-of-justice en *834 hancement. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.4); United States v. Martinez, 234 F.3d 1047, 1048 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam); United States v. Ngo, 132 F.3d 1231, 1233 (8th Cir.1997).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salazar-Guzman v. United States
535 U.S. 946 (Supreme Court, 2002)
United States v. Nam Xuan Ngo
132 F.3d 1231 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Jeffrey Brian Martinez
234 F.3d 1047 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Val Perez
270 F.3d 737 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 F. App'x 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-ellis-ca8-2002.