United States v. James Edward Farley
This text of 424 F.2d 255 (United States v. James Edward Farley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 11, 1968, appellant escaped from custody while being transported from the Maryland House of Correction to appear in the United States District Court on a writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum. For this he was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 751(a).
The sole challenge of this appeal is to the jurisdiction of the court below on the theory that appellant was not in federal custody when he escaped. The contention lacks merit. Since appellant was being conveyed under valid process of the federal government, he was in federal custody. Derengowski v. United States, 404 F.2d 778 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. den., 394 U.S. 1024, 89 S.Ct. 1640, 23 L.Ed.2d 49. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is granted.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 F.2d 255, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-edward-farley-ca4-1970.